Premises Liability Claims Involving Child Trespassers
- Home / Personal Injury /
- Premises Liability Claims Involving Child Trespassers
November 30, 2020
Often, children do not understand why something is dangerous until someone else gets injured or they suffer an injury themselves. Their lack of understanding may cause them to make bad decisions that put themselves or others in danger.
Arizona law recognizes children often do not use good judgment about potentially dangerous situations. Under the attractive nuisance doctrine, property owners have an obligation to help protect children from danger, even if they were trespassing.
Was your child injured on someone else’s property, such as in a swimming pool accident or another accident involving something that was likely to attract children? There may be grounds for a premises liability claim under the attractive nuisance doctrine.
Phillips Law Group’s Phoenix premises liability attorneys have in-depth knowledge of Arizona laws governing these types of cases. We have a proven track record of recovering compensation for those injured due to another’s negligence.
Premises Liability Claims Involving Trespassers
Generally, property owners do not owe trespassers much of a duty of care. They usually do not need to do much to try to prevent a trespasser from getting hurt. This is because trespassers do not have a legal right to be on the property.
A property owner could potentially be held liable for an injury to a trespasser if he or she willfully or maliciously caused injury to the trespasser.
However, if the trespasser was a child, the property owner may owe the child much more care to try to prevent an injury from occurring.
What is an Attractive Nuisance?
There are certain features on a property that are likely to attract children, such as:
- Swimming pools
- Trampolines
- Tree houses
- Tunnels
- Wells
- Fountains
- Scaffolding
- Ladders
- Stairs
- Rooftop that is easily accessible
These could be considered attractive nuisances if your lawyer can prove they are likely to attract children and there is a potential for injury.
The property owner may have had a duty to do something to try to prevent children from gaining access to the nuisance. For example, putting a fence around a swimming pool or a sign warning of the danger of climbing on a ladder may protect a property owner from liability if a child trespasses and suffers an injury.
There are other types of nuisances that are unlikely to be considered attractive nuisances, legally speaking:
- Ponds
- Lakes
- Hills
- Cliffs
- Tress
- Choking hazards, like acorns or sticks
- Hot water
- Poison
- Sharp objects
- Fire
Building an Attractive Nuisance Claim
There are several things your attorney may need to establish to prove a property owner is liable for an injury involving a child and an attractive nuisance:
- The property owner knew or should have known children would be attracted to the property and were likely to trespass
- The property owner knows or should know the condition poses an unreasonable risk of harm to child who may trespass
- Children do not understand the potential risks of the condition in question
- It would not have been prohibitively expensive to take steps to prevent accidents
- The property owner did not use reasonable care to prevent injury
- Your child suffered an injury because of the nuisance in question
Defining Reasonable Care
Each case is unique, so it is difficult to determine what it would mean for a property owner to take reasonable care to prevent an injury from an attractive nuisance. However, reasonable care often amounts to good judgment based on the situation.
For example, building a fence around a pool and installing floodlights or an alarm system could all be considered reasonable steps. Locking up dangerous chemicals or other objects could also be considered reasonable. Potentially dangerous animals should be leashed or locked up.
While some property owners may think a sign will shield them from liability, this may not be true. A sign by itself may not be enough ”“ the property owner may need to prove he or she did something else to keep children away from the attractive nuisance.
If a fence or floodlights fall into disrepair and do not work when a child trespasses, the property owner may be held liable for any injuries that result. It is reasonable to expect a property owner to inspect a fence or lights to be sure they work.
Have Questions About Your Claim? Give Us a Call
If you need assistance after an accident on another’s property, Phillips Law Group is here to help. We have been representing personal injury victims in Arizona for nearly 30 years and have a proven record of success.
The initial consultation comes with no cost and there are no upfront fees for our services unless we obtain compensation on your behalf.
Need Legal Assistance? Call Phillips Law Group Today: 1-800-706-3000
Free Case Evaluation
By submitting your contact information, you agree that we may contact you by telephone (including text) and email in accordance with our Terms and Privacy Policy

Your message has been sent
Thank you for your message, we will get back to you soon.
-
Jasmine , did a great job . Highly recommend!!!!!
-
Liz Gonzales was great!!!!
-
Phillips Law Group is a company that has taught me so many things. Here your work, your dedication, effort and discipline are valued, in addition to the fact that, as a woman, as an immigrant and as a human being, I have been given value and empowerment. We are a successful law firm because all workers feel part of a great family. I am very proud and honored to work at Phillips Law Group.
-
I just wanted to thank Phillips law Group and Vanessa Rodriguez for all the help that she did for my daughter’s case. She was involved in her first accident and she needed the help to deal with these adjusters. Thank you again.
-
If you are in need of legal support for a motor vehicle collision of any kind, I highly recommend going to Phillips Law Group Injury Lawyers. Sean Davis has exemplary knowledge and experience in this field, compassion for his clients, and excellent judgment and communication skills.
-
Definitely recommend! Awesome
-
Although my accident was fortunately not a major one, The Phillips Law Group AZ treated it as such. Their staff, specifically Mr Juan Roque was very professional, courteous and most importantly very informative. Mr Roque's attentive service was phenomenal and I highly recommend this firm!
-
Great company and awesome service. Thanks Caroline fabos. Kudos to all.
-
Jasmine Delgado is an amazing paralegal. She was patient, kind and extremely knowledgeable. Highly recommend Phillips law group
-
Working at Phillips Law Group has been great the 1st few years in I noticed how well organized and run this Firm was from Intake to Settlement the Client has the expertise of a staff member uniquely qualified for the particular stage of each Clients claim and all other Law firms try to emulate what we do here but none quite get it right because they lack one major component “Compassion”. We are a FAMILY not just a group of people/employees. We care deeply about each other and our clients’ we are considerate, compassionate and make sure that all our Clients’ needs are met from beginning to end. That’s because we treat our clients just like we treat each other. Nothing like walking through the office and saying Hello to fellow employees who always seem to be smiling. 16yrs in and it only seems to be getting better.