The Difference between Paid and Unpaid Breaks
- Home / Employee Rights /
- The Difference between Paid and Unpaid Breaks
March 28, 2017
Most workers in Arizona are accustomed to having breaks throughout the workday. While employees may view breaks as a right they are entitled to, employers are not required to provide time off during the workday.
However, if an employer chooses to provide workers with breaks throughout the day, those breaks are regulated by state and federal laws that determine which are to be paid and unpaid.
If your employer violates or ignores these standards, an experienced employment law attorney can help you protect your rights as a worker.
Employee Breaks Covered by Federal Law
An employer is required by federal employment laws to pay an employee for all hours he or she has worked.
Employers can designate a “bona fide” meal period that usually lasts for at least 30 minutes and for which the employee is not paid for. The employee must be completely relieved of his or her duties during this time.
However, if an employee is required to work during his or her meal period, he or she must paid for this time.
For example, if an employee eats lunch at his or her desk while continuing to perform regular work duties, the employer is required to pay the employee.
Employers can also provide short breaks throughout the day that can last five to 20 minutes. Small rest breaks like these promote efficiency in the workplace and are considered to be part of an employee’s regular working hours, which means he or she must be paid during this period.
Arizona’s Law for Employee Breaks
It is up to each state’s discretion to create its own laws for a mandatory break period for employees. Arizona currently does not have any such law.
Instead, Arizona’s employment law concerning employee breaks closely follows the standards set by the federal government.
If an employer chooses to provide his or her employees with a designated break, he or she must follow the standards laid out by federal legislation.
This means any extended break period laid out by an employer as a bona fide meal time must also relieve an employee of his or her job duties. If the employee is required to work during this period, he or she must be paid.
An employee must also be paid for any short breaks throughout the day lasting between five and 20 minutes.
Legal Help for Arizona Workers
If you have not been rightfully paid by your employer for the time you have worked, you may be entitled compensation.
The Phoenix employment law attorneys at thePhillips Law Group are willing to pursue any employer who mistreats his or her employees. We will fight to uphold the rights of wronged workers to ensure they receive the treatment and compensation they deserve.
Call 1-800-706-3000 to discuss your claim with one of our attorneys today. Free consultation by phone. No fees to start your case and no fees unless we win.
Free Case Evaluation
By submitting your contact information, you agree that we may contact you by telephone (including text) and email in accordance with our Terms and Privacy Policy

Your message has been sent
Thank you for your message, we will get back to you soon.
-
Phillips law group has an amazing staff and i recommend them to everyone.
-
My Attorney Sean Davis and his paralegal Hannah Dustin worked on my case. They listened to the problems that I was having with my case and they both got right to work. First they found me a doctor that actually listened to my problems from my car accident and worked quickly to form a plan that was comfortable for me and the doctor. The doctor was the best and after a couple of procedures the pain in my neck was gone. Behind the scenes Sean and Hannah were working hard to get my case settled with the insurance company. They kept in contact with me on all aspects of my case. They settled my case much faster than I expected and for more than I was expecting. If you want two real professional legal people to work on your case, I would highly recommend Sean and Hannah to you. I cannot say enough nice things about these two. Thank you so much, Rickey Hart .
-
Liz was great
-
I would have no hesitation at all recommending Phillips Law Group. In particular, Juan Roque has impressed me with his professionalism, his integrity and his heart for the community!
-
-
Many companies talk about teamwork but few practice it. Many companies talk about an employee friendly environment but few actually provide it. At Phillips Law Group the foundation of our success is making sure we work as a team and that we work in an environment that allows everyone to thrive and be at their best every day. Our firm understands that in order for the client to have a great experience the people responsible for that client’s case must be given all the necessary tools and encouragement to make that happen. That’s the Phillips Way. As a manager of this firm in charge of several employees as well as directly affecting the client’s experience I take tremendous pride in saying we live by these premises and we work hard to build on them and make them better every day. This is an amazing place because it has amazing people working here!
-
Jasmine helped me so so much I want to thank her ! And also Aaron , i was always scared after an accident , knowing I would have to deal with lawyers but not here . Luckily I’ve only been in 3 accidents but this time it was fast and easy . And i received all the treatments I needed to help me recover ! Thank you Jasmine and Aaron!
-
Great company and awesome service. Thanks Caroline fabos. Kudos to all.
-
Phillips Law Group has a proven track record of success. Juan Roque, in particular, is integral to that. He works with integrity, compassion, and an undefeated optimism that makes him a valuable asset.
-
Two family members were in a bad wreck a couple of years ago, and as a result called Phillips Law to represent them. Montana Thompson was the attorney assigned to the case with the help of Nemo Farr as legal assistant. Mr. Thompson litigated a very generous settlement for both my stepdaughter and her son. Because my grandson is a minor, I decided to act as conservator for him to ensure the settlement was safe and secure. Montana helped with that process, but it was Nemo who went way above and beyond the call in finding a financial institution to use for the restricted account. There were some glitches in that process but Nemo helped navigate them with a calm expertise which belies his age. I would consider them both great representatives of the level of commitment to their clients and assets to their firm.